Ricoh CX4 vs Sony H200
92 Imaging
34 Features
34 Overall
34
67 Imaging
45 Features
31 Overall
39
Ricoh CX4 vs Sony H200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Released August 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Introduced January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh CX4 vs Sony H200 Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Ricoh CX4 versus Sony H200, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the CX4 (10MP) and H200 (20MP) but they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe CX4 was unveiled 3 years before the H200 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a concise overview of how the CX4 scores vs the H200 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh CX4 vs Sony H200 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh CX4 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The full galleries are available at Ricoh CX4 Gallery and Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Sony H200
| CX4 | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Ricoh CX4
| H200 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | August 2010 | Newer by 29 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX4 and Sony H200
| CX4 | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh CX4 vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh CX4 offers physical dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Sony H200 has measurements of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") having a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh CX4 versus Sony H200 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is the front view size comparison of the CX4 compared to the H200.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the CX4 and H200 is 92 and 67 respectively.
Ricoh CX4 vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to envision the difference between sensor dimensions only by checking a spec sheet. The pic here should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX4 and H200.
Clearly, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Sony H200 to resolve greater detail having an extra 10MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged CX4 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Ricoh CX4 vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Ricoh CX4 vs Sony H200 Specifications
| Ricoh CX4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh CX4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-08-19 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 2920 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 20cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 920k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | ClearPhoto LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 6.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 lb) | 530g (1.17 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 pictures |
| Style of battery | - | AA |
| Battery ID | DB-100 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $211 | $250 |
