Ricoh CX4 vs Sony HX200V
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
Ricoh CX4 vs Sony HX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Introduced May 2012
- Older Model is Sony HX100V
- Replacement is Sony HX300
Ricoh CX4 vs Sony HX200V Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Ricoh CX4 vs Sony HX200V, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Ricoh and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the CX4 (10MP) and HX200V (18MP) but they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe CX4 was released 21 months before the HX200V which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the CX4 grades against the HX200V in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh CX4 vs Sony HX200V Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh CX4 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh CX4 Gallery & Sony HX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Sony HX200V
CX4 | HX200V |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Ricoh CX4
HX200V | CX4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2012 | August 2010 | Fresher by 21 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 920k | Sharper screen (+2k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh CX4 and Sony HX200V
CX4 | HX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Ricoh CX4 vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh CX4 comes with physical measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Sony HX200V has proportions of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") with a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh CX4 vs Sony HX200V in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the CX4 against the HX200V.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the CX4 and HX200V is 92 and 66 respectively.
Ricoh CX4 vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to envision the gap in sensor sizing simply by seeing technical specs. The photograph underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the CX4 and HX200V.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Sony HX200V to produce more detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots much more aggressively. The older CX4 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Ricoh CX4 vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX4 vs Sony HX200V Specifications
Ricoh CX4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh CX4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2010-08-19 | 2012-05-11 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | BIONZ |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 27-810mm (30.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 12.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) | 583 gr (1.29 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 450 photos |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB-100 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $211 | $480 |