Ricoh CX4 vs Zeiss ZX1
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
67 Imaging
78 Features
62 Overall
71
Ricoh CX4 vs Zeiss ZX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 37MP - Full frame Sensor
- 4.34" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 51200
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 35mm (F2-22) lens
- 800g - 142 x 93 x 46mm
- Launched September 2018
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh CX4 vs Zeiss ZX1 Overview
Following is a thorough assessment of the Ricoh CX4 versus Zeiss ZX1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Zeiss. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the CX4 (10MP) and ZX1 (37MP) and the CX4 (1/2.3") and ZX1 (Full frame) enjoy totally different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe CX4 was launched 9 years earlier than the ZX1 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera and the Zeiss ZX1 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick view of how the CX4 grades against the ZX1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh CX4 vs Zeiss ZX1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh CX4 & Zeiss ZX1. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX4 Gallery & Zeiss ZX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Zeiss ZX1
| CX4 | ZX1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Zeiss ZX1 over the Ricoh CX4
| ZX1 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2018 |  | August 2010 | More modern by 98 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display sizing | 4.34" |  | 3" | Larger display (+1.34") |
| Display resolution | 2765k |  | 920k | Crisper display (+1845k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh CX4 and Zeiss ZX1
| CX4 | ZX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Ricoh CX4 vs Zeiss ZX1 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh CX4 provides exterior measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Zeiss ZX1 has measurements of 142mm x 93mm x 46mm (5.6" x 3.7" x 1.8") and a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh CX4 versus Zeiss ZX1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the CX4 against the ZX1.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the CX4 and ZX1 is 92 and 67 respectively.
Ricoh CX4 vs Zeiss ZX1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to see the difference between sensor sizes simply by reading through specifications. The picture here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the CX4 and ZX1.
Plainly, the two cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The CX4 due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Zeiss ZX1 will give you extra detail utilizing its extra 27 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged CX4 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Ricoh CX4 vs Zeiss ZX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Ricoh CX4 vs Zeiss ZX1 Specifications
| Ricoh CX4 | Zeiss ZX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Zeiss |
| Model type | Ricoh CX4 | Zeiss ZX1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-08-19 | 2018-09-27 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 36 x 24mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 864.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 37 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 7488 x 4992 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 51200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 255 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 35mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/2-22 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display size | 3" | 4.34" |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 2,765 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 6,221 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 lbs) | 800g (1.76 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 142 x 93 x 46mm (5.6" x 3.7" x 1.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | DB-100 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | 512GB internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $211 | - |