Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-50
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2017
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
The following is a in-depth review of the Ricoh CX5 versus Ricoh WG-50, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof and both are produced by Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the CX5 (10MP) and WG-50 (16MP) but they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe CX5 was launched 6 years prior to the WG-50 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the CX5 scores against the WG-50 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh CX5 & Ricoh WG-50. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh CX5 Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Ricoh WG-50
| CX5 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Ricoh CX5
| WG-50 | CX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2017 |  | July 2011 | Newer by 71 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX5 and Ricoh WG-50
| CX5 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh CX5 enjoys physical dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-50 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh CX5 versus Ricoh WG-50 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the CX5 compared to the WG-50.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the CX5 and WG-50 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions simply by checking specs. The image below will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the CX5 and WG-50.
All in all, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Ricoh WG-50 to give greater detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged CX5 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
| Ricoh CX5 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Ricoh |
| Model type | Ricoh CX5 | Ricoh WG-50 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2011-07-19 | 2017-05-24 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lb) | 193 grams (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 shots |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | DB-100 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $399 | $280 |