Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-70
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched February 2020
- Refreshed by Ricoh WG-80
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Ricoh CX5 and Ricoh WG-70, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are designed by Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the CX5 (10MP) and WG-70 (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe CX5 was unveiled 9 years earlier than the WG-70 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the CX5 grades against the WG-70 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh CX5 & Ricoh WG-70. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh CX5 Gallery & Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Ricoh WG-70
| CX5 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Ricoh CX5
| WG-70 | CX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2020 |  | July 2011 | Newer by 104 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX5 and Ricoh WG-70
| CX5 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX5 offers external measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-70 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh CX5 and Ricoh WG-70 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the CX5 versus the WG-70.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the CX5 and WG-70 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to see the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reading specifications. The picture here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the CX5 and WG-70.
To sum up, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Ricoh WG-70 to offer greater detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged CX5 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| Ricoh CX5 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Ricoh |
| Model | Ricoh CX5 | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2011-07-19 | 2020-02-04 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | DB-100 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $399 | $280 |