Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-M1
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-M1, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof and they are both created by Ricoh. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the CX5 (10MP) and WG-M1 (14MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe CX5 was brought out 4 years earlier than the WG-M1 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the CX5 scores vs the WG-M1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh CX5 and Ricoh WG-M1. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX5 Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| CX5 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+805k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Ricoh CX5
| WG-M1 | CX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2014 |  | July 2011 | More modern by 38 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX5 and Ricoh WG-M1
| CX5 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh CX5 offers outside measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has proportions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
See the Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-M1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the CX5 versus the WG-M1.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the CX5 and WG-M1 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to envision the difference in sensor sizes only by seeing specs. The image underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the CX5 and WG-M1.
All in all, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Ricoh WG-M1 to show greater detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged CX5 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Ricoh CX5 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Ricoh |
| Model type | Ricoh CX5 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2011-07-19 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | (1×) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 1.5 inch |
| Display resolution | 920k dot | 115k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 pounds) | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 shots |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | DB-100 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $399 | $2,000 |
