Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung NX300
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
86 Imaging
63 Features
73 Overall
67
Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung NX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Released November 2013
- Superseded the Samsung NX210
- Renewed by Samsung NX500
Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung NX300 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Ricoh CX5 versus Samsung NX300, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the CX5 (10MP) and NX300 (20MP) and the CX5 (1/2.3") and NX300 (APS-C) offer different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe CX5 was launched 3 years before the NX300 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh CX5 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the CX5 grades versus the NX300 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung NX300 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh CX5 and Samsung NX300. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX5 Gallery and Samsung NX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Samsung NX300
CX5 | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 768k | Crisper display (+152k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Ricoh CX5
NX300 | CX5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | November 2013 | July 2011 | More modern by 28 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimensions | 3.3" | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh CX5 and Samsung NX300
CX5 | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung NX300 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh CX5 has physical dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung NX300 has dimensions of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") having a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
See the Ricoh CX5 versus Samsung NX300 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the CX5 versus the NX300.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the CX5 and NX300 is 92 and 86 respectively.
Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung NX300 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizes just by checking out specs. The picture below might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX5 and NX300.
All in all, both the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The CX5 due to its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more challenging and the Samsung NX300 will provide greater detail utilizing its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images more aggressively. The more aged CX5 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung NX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung NX300 Specifications
Ricoh CX5 | Samsung NX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh CX5 | Samsung NX300 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2011-07-19 | 2013-11-24 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 247 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3.3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 768 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lb) | 331 gr (0.73 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 76 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 942 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 shots |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB-100 | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $399 | $750 |