Clicky

Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung ST95

Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34
Ricoh CX5 front
 
Samsung ST95 front
Portability
99
Imaging
39
Features
19
Overall
31

Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs

Ricoh CX5
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
  • Introduced July 2011
Samsung ST95
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Revealed January 2011
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung ST95 Overview

On this page, we are contrasting the Ricoh CX5 versus Samsung ST95, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the CX5 (10MP) and ST95 (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

The CX5 was revealed 7 months later than the ST95 so they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh CX5 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the CX5 grades versus the ST95 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Samsung ST95

 CX5 ST95 
RevealedJuly 2011January 2011Fresher by 7 months
Focus manually Very accurate focus
Display resolution920k460kClearer display (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Ricoh CX5

 ST95 CX5 

Common features in the Ricoh CX5 and Samsung ST95

 CX5 ST95 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display dimensions
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch display Lacking Touch display

Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to carry your camera often, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Ricoh CX5 has got outside measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST95 has proportions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Analyze the Ricoh CX5 versus Samsung ST95 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the CX5 compared to the ST95.

Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung ST95 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the CX5 and ST95 is 92 and 99 respectively.

Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung ST95 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizing only by going through specifications. The graphic below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the CX5 and ST95.

To sum up, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Samsung ST95 to provide greater detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The more recent CX5 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung ST95 sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh CX5 Portrait photography information
Samsung ST95 Portrait photography information
28
you can focus manually
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
30
decent MP (16MP)
manual focus not available
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Ricoh CX5 Street photography info
Samsung ST95 Street photography info
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (205g)
fixed screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
50
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
maximum ISO low (0)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Ricoh CX5 Sports photography factors
Samsung ST95 Sports photography factors
25
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
27
decent MP (16 megapixels)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Ricoh CX5 Travel photography details
Samsung ST95 Travel photography details
66
lighter than others (205 grams)
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
very long reach (300mm)
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
71
decent MP (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
good maximum aperture (f)
lack of Time Lapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh CX5 Landscape photography features
Samsung ST95 Landscape photography features
45
you can focus manually
pretty wide (28mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
38
good maximum aperture (f)
screen size is decent (3")
decent MP (16MP)
manual focus not available
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
manual exposure not available
does not have image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
maximum ISO low (0)
has no RAW files
lack of Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX5 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung ST95 as a Vlogging camera
30
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (205g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external mic port
27
good maximum aperture (f)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external mic jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX5 and Samsung ST95
 Ricoh CX5Samsung ST95
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh CX5 Samsung ST95
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Ultracompact
Introduced 2011-07-19 2011-01-19
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 -
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 -
Min native ISO 100 -
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-300mm (10.7x) ()
Maximum aperture f/3.5-5.6 -
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 seconds 8 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 5.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 4.00 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 205 grams (0.45 pounds) -
Physical dimensions 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID DB-100 -
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) -
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal -
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at release $399 $145