Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung TL240
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Also Known as ST5000
Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung TL240 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung TL240, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the CX5 (10MP) and TL240 (14MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe CX5 was unveiled 19 months later than the TL240 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh CX5 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the CX5 grades against the TL240 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh CX5 & Samsung TL240. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh CX5 Gallery & Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Samsung TL240
CX5 | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2011 | January 2010 | Fresher by 19 months | |
Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Ricoh CX5
TL240 | CX5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh CX5 and Samsung TL240
CX5 | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh CX5 has got external measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung TL240 has proportions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung TL240 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the CX5 vs the TL240.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the CX5 and TL240 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizing only by researching specs. The photograph below may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the CX5 and TL240.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can count on the Samsung TL240 to provide you with greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs more aggressively. The fresher CX5 should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
Ricoh CX5 | Samsung TL240 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh CX5 | Samsung TL240 |
Also Known as | - | ST5000 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2011-07-19 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4334 x 3256 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 4800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
Resolution of display | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205g (0.45 lbs) | 160g (0.35 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | DB-100 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $399 | $171 |