Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB250F
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
The following is a thorough assessment of the Ricoh CX5 and Samsung WB250F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the CX5 (10MP) and WB250F (14MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe CX5 was announced 17 months earlier than the WB250F making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the CX5 grades against the WB250F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh CX5 and Samsung WB250F. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX5 Gallery and Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Samsung WB250F
| CX5 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Ricoh CX5
| WB250F | CX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | July 2011 | Newer by 17 months |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh CX5 and Samsung WB250F
| CX5 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX5 provides physical dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung WB250F has sizing of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh CX5 and Samsung WB250F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the CX5 against the WB250F.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the CX5 and WB250F is 92 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to envision the gap in sensor dimensions purely by seeing specifications. The image underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the CX5 and WB250F.
To sum up, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Samsung WB250F to provide more detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged CX5 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| Ricoh CX5 | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh CX5 | Samsung WB250F |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-07-19 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 920k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 pounds) | 226g (0.50 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | DB-100 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $399 | $250 |
