Clicky

Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB35F

Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34
Ricoh CX5 front
 
Samsung WB35F front
Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37

Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs

Ricoh CX5
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
  • Released July 2011
Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Launched January 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB35F Overview

The following is a extended assessment of the Ricoh CX5 and Samsung WB35F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the CX5 (10MP) and WB35F (16MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The CX5 was unveiled 3 years prior to the WB35F which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a short highlight of how the CX5 scores against the WB35F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Samsung WB35F

 CX5 WB35F 
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kClearer display (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Ricoh CX5

 WB35F CX5 
LaunchedJanuary 2014July 2011Newer by 30 months

Common features in the Ricoh CX5 and Samsung WB35F

 CX5 WB35F 
Manual focus More accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither offers Touch friendly display

Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to travel with your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX5 offers external measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has sizing of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).

Look at the Ricoh CX5 and Samsung WB35F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at the time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the CX5 vs the WB35F.

Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the CX5 and WB35F is 92 and 93 respectively.

Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison

Normally, its difficult to see the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reading through specs. The pic below will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the CX5 and WB35F.

All in all, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Samsung WB35F to give you more detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged CX5 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh CX5
Portrait photography with Samsung WB35F
28
manual focus
external flash not possible
MP count low (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
37
focusing manually
good resolution (16MP)
no manual control
no external flash support
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh CX5
Street photography with Samsung WB35F
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (205 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (194g)
no articulating screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Ricoh CX5 Sports photography details
Samsung WB35F Sports photography details
25
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
max frames per second low (5.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
40
has image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16MP)
no shutter priority
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Ricoh CX5 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB35F as a Travel photography camera
66
lighter than average (205g)
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
long reach (300mm)
MP count low (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
70
lighter than others (194g)
good resolution (16MP)
flash built-in
fairly wide (24mm)
great reach (288mm)
no Time Lapse function
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.1)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh CX5 Landscape photography information
Samsung WB35F Landscape photography information
45
manual focus
really wide (28mm)
decent sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
43
focusing manually
fairly wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
no manual control
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
no Time Lapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX5 Vlogging details
Samsung WB35F Vlogging details
30
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (205g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have microphone port
31
fairly wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (194g)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
display is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
no mic port
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX5 and Samsung WB35F
 Ricoh CX5Samsung WB35F
General Information
Make Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh CX5 Samsung WB35F
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2011-07-19 2014-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-300mm (10.7x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.6 f/3.1-6.3
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of display 920 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 seconds 8 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 5.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.00 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync -
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 205g (0.45 lb) 194g (0.43 lb)
Physical dimensions 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID DB-100 BP70A
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) -
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Price at release $399 $130