Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB700
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
![Ricoh CX5 front Ricoh CX5 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-CX5/Ricoh-CX5-front.jpg)
![Samsung WB700 front Samsung WB700 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-WB700/Samsung-WB700-front.jpg)
98 Imaging
37 Features
21 Overall
30
Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed December 2010
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB700 Overview
Lets look closer at the Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB700, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the CX5 (10MP) and WB700 (14MP) but they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
The CX5 was released 7 months later than the WB700 and they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the CX5 scores vs the WB700 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB700 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh CX5 and Samsung WB700. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh CX5 Gallery and Samsung WB700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Samsung WB700
CX5 | WB700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2011 | ![]() | December 2010 | Fresher by 7 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 614k | Clearer display (+306k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Ricoh CX5
WB700 | CX5 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh CX5 and Samsung WB700
CX5 | WB700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh CX5 comes with outside measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB700 has proportions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB700 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at the time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the CX5 against the WB700.
![Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB700 size comparison Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB700 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Ricoh-CX5-vs-Samsung-WB700-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the CX5 and WB700 is 92 and 98 respectively.
![Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB700 top view buttons comparison Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB700 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Ricoh-CX5-vs-Samsung-WB700-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing merely by reading through a spec sheet. The visual underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the CX5 and WB700.
As you can see, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should anticipate the Samsung WB700 to give you extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a little more aggressively. The fresher CX5 provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
![Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB700 sensor size comparison Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB700 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Ricoh-CX5-vs-Samsung-WB700-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder
![Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Ricoh-CX5-vs-Samsung-WB700-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Ricoh CX5 vs Samsung WB700 Specifications
Ricoh CX5 | Samsung WB700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh CX5 | Samsung WB700 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2011-07-19 | 2010-12-28 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | - |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | () |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205g (0.45 pounds) | - |
Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | DB-100 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $399 | $300 |