Clicky

Ricoh CX5 vs Sony A200

Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34
Ricoh CX5 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front
Portability
66
Imaging
50
Features
38
Overall
45

Ricoh CX5 vs Sony A200 Key Specs

Ricoh CX5
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
  • Revealed July 2011
Sony A200
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
  • Revealed July 2008
  • Refreshed by Sony A230
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Ricoh CX5 vs Sony A200 Overview

Below is a in depth review of the Ricoh CX5 vs Sony A200, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the CX5 (10MP) and the A200 (10MP) is relatively similar but the CX5 (1/2.3") and A200 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor size.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The CX5 was introduced 3 years later than the A200 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh CX5 being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short overview of how the CX5 scores versus the A200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Sony A200

 CX5 A200 
RevealedJuly 2011July 2008More recent by 37 months
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kClearer screen (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Ricoh CX5

 A200 CX5 

Common features in the Ricoh CX5 and Sony A200

 CX5 A200 
Manually focus Very accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch screen Missing Touch screen

Ricoh CX5 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh CX5 has outside dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Sony A200 has specifications of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).

Examine the Ricoh CX5 vs Sony A200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the CX5 vs the A200.

Ricoh CX5 vs Sony A200 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the CX5 and A200 is 92 and 66 respectively.

Ricoh CX5 vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX5 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very hard to envision the difference between sensor measurements merely by reviewing technical specs. The photograph here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX5 and A200.

As you can tell, both of these cameras provide the same megapixel count albeit not the same sensor measurements. The CX5 provides the tinier sensor which is going to make getting shallower depth of field harder. The younger CX5 will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Ricoh CX5 vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX5 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX5 vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh CX5 Portrait photography features
Sony A200 Portrait photography features
28
focusing manually
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
54
you can focus manually
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
no liveview
low MP (10MP)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Ricoh CX5 Street photography details
Sony A200 Street photography details
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (205g)
screen does not articulate
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
66
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
screen does not articulate
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Ricoh CX5 Sports photography advice
Sony A200 Sports photography advice
25
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
50
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
sensor has phase detect AF
no liveview
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
low MP (10 megapixels)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Ricoh CX5 Travel photography advice
Sony A200 Travel photography advice
66
lighter than competitors (205g)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
very long reach (300mm)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
46
built-in flash
missing Timelapse function
low MP (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh CX5 Landscape photography factors
Sony A200 Landscape photography factors
45
focusing manually
reasonably wide (28mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
54
you can focus manually
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
screen is small (2.7")
no liveview
low MP (10 megapixels)
missing Timelapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX5 Vlogging features
Sony A200 Vlogging features
30
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (205g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing microphone socket
9
can't shoot video
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh CX5 vs Sony A200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX5 and Sony A200
 Ricoh CX5Sony Alpha DSLR-A200
General Information
Make Ricoh Sony
Model type Ricoh CX5 Sony Alpha DSLR-A200
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level DSLR
Revealed 2011-07-19 2008-07-17
Body design Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Chip Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 -
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 3872 x 2592
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points - 9
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range 28-300mm (10.7x) -
Max aperture f/3.5-5.6 -
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Amount of lenses - 143
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.55x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8s 30s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed 5.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.00 m 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Highest video resolution 1280x720 None
Video format Motion JPEG -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 205 gr (0.45 lb) 572 gr (1.26 lb)
Physical dimensions 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 63
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.3
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.3
DXO Low light rating not tested 521
Other
Battery ID DB-100 -
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal Compact Flash
Storage slots 1 1
Launch price $399 $100