Ricoh CX5 vs Sony A390
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
66 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54
Ricoh CX5 vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Older Model is Sony A380
Ricoh CX5 vs Sony A390 Overview
Here is a extended comparison of the Ricoh CX5 versus Sony A390, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Ricoh and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the CX5 (10MP) and A390 (14MP) and the CX5 (1/2.3") and A390 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe CX5 was manufactured 12 months later than the A390 so they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh CX5 being a Compact camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a short overview of how the CX5 scores vs the A390 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh CX5 vs Sony A390 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh CX5 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh CX5 Gallery & Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Sony A390
CX5 | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2011 | July 2010 | Fresher by 12 months | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Ricoh CX5
A390 | CX5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Ricoh CX5 and Sony A390
CX5 | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh CX5 vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh CX5 comes with external dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Sony A390 has dimensions of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") along with a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh CX5 versus Sony A390 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the CX5 against the A390.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the CX5 and A390 is 92 and 66 respectively.
Ricoh CX5 vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizing just by looking through a spec sheet. The visual below may provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX5 and A390.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The CX5 featuring a smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sony A390 will render greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more modern CX5 will have a benefit in sensor tech.
Ricoh CX5 vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX5 vs Sony A390 Specifications
Ricoh CX5 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh CX5 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2011-07-19 | 2010-07-28 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4592 x 3056 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205g (0.45 lbs) | 549g (1.21 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 607 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 230 shots |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB-100 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $399 | $500 |