Ricoh CX5 vs Sony NEX-C3
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
91 Imaging
56 Features
57 Overall
56
Ricoh CX5 vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
- Revealed August 2011
- Succeeded the Sony NEX-3
- Successor is Sony NEX-F3
Ricoh CX5 vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Ricoh CX5 vs Sony NEX-C3, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Ricoh and Sony. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the CX5 (10MP) and NEX-C3 (16MP) and the CX5 (1/2.3") and NEX-C3 (APS-C) have different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe CX5 was unveiled around the same time to the NEX-C3 and they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh CX5 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the CX5 grades vs the NEX-C3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh CX5 vs Sony NEX-C3 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh CX5 and Sony Alpha NEX-C3. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX5 Gallery and Sony NEX-C3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Sony NEX-C3
CX5 | NEX-C3 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Ricoh CX5
NEX-C3 | CX5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Ricoh CX5 and Sony NEX-C3
CX5 | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2011 | August 2011 | Same generation | |
Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 920k | Exact same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Ricoh CX5 vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh CX5 has got external measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Sony NEX-C3 has measurements of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh CX5 vs Sony NEX-C3 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the CX5 vs the NEX-C3.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the CX5 and NEX-C3 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh CX5 vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements just by researching technical specs. The graphic underneath may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the CX5 and NEX-C3.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The CX5 using its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Sony NEX-C3 will render extra detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively.
Ricoh CX5 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX5 vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications
Ricoh CX5 | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh CX5 | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2011-07-19 | 2011-08-22 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4912 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 920k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 6.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205g (0.45 lb) | 225g (0.50 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.2 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1083 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB-100 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $399 | $343 |