Ricoh CX6 vs Samsung CL80
92 Imaging
34 Features
38 Overall
35
95 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
Ricoh CX6 vs Samsung CL80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 201g - 104 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced November 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Launched January 2010
- Additionally Known as ST5500
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh CX6 vs Samsung CL80 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Ricoh CX6 versus Samsung CL80, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the CX6 (10MP) and CL80 (14MP) but they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe CX6 was revealed 23 months later than the CL80 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. The two cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh CX6 being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL80 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go through a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the CX6 grades against the CL80 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh CX6 vs Samsung CL80 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh CX6 & Samsung CL80. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh CX6 Gallery & Samsung CL80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX6 over the Samsung CL80
| CX6 | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | November 2011 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 23 months |
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+1000k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL80 over the Ricoh CX6
| CL80 | CX6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3.7" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.7") |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh CX6 and Samsung CL80
| CX6 | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Ricoh CX6 vs Samsung CL80 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX6 enjoys physical dimensions of 104mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Samsung CL80 has sizing of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh CX6 versus Samsung CL80 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the CX6 and the CL80.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the CX6 and CL80 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh CX6 vs Samsung CL80 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing just by looking at technical specs. The photograph here may provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX6 and CL80.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Samsung CL80 to resolve extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The fresher CX6 will have an edge in sensor innovation.
Ricoh CX6 vs Samsung CL80 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Ricoh CX6 vs Samsung CL80 Specifications
| Ricoh CX6 | Samsung CL80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh CX6 | Samsung CL80 |
| Also Known as | - | ST5500 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2011-11-15 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 4800 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 1,230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | Sony WhiteMagic VGA LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 201 gr (0.44 lbs) | 160 gr (0.35 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | DB-100 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $595 | $400 |