Ricoh G700SE vs Samsung WB2200F
88 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Ricoh G700SE vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 307g - 117 x 68 x 32mm
- Announced October 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Introduced January 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh G700SE vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
Lets look much closer at the Ricoh G700SE and Samsung WB2200F, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the G700SE (12MP) and WB2200F (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe G700SE was introduced 4 years earlier than the WB2200F which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh G700SE being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the G700SE grades vs the WB2200F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh G700SE vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh G700SE & Samsung WB2200F. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh G700SE Gallery & Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh G700SE over the Samsung WB2200F
| G700SE | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Ricoh G700SE
| WB2200F | G700SE | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 |  | October 2010 | More modern by 39 months |
Common features in the Ricoh G700SE and Samsung WB2200F
| G700SE | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Ricoh G700SE vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Ricoh G700SE enjoys physical dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 32mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.3") with a weight of 307 grams (0.68 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB2200F has proportions of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") having a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh G700SE and Samsung WB2200F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the G700SE vs the WB2200F.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the G700SE and WB2200F is 88 and 59 respectively.
Ricoh G700SE vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizes purely by going over technical specs. The pic here should give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the G700SE and WB2200F.
As you can tell, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can count on the Samsung WB2200F to offer extra detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged G700SE is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Ricoh G700SE vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Ricoh G700SE vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
| Ricoh G700SE | Samsung WB2200F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh G700SE | Samsung WB2200F |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-10-13 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200 thousand dot |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 1/8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Auto red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480, 320 x 240 | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 307 gr (0.68 pounds) | 708 gr (1.56 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 117 x 68 x 32mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.3") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | DB-60 | BP-1410 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $0 | $599 |