Ricoh G900 vs Samsung HZ35W
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Launched February 2018
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced June 2010
- Alternative Name is WB650
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh G900 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
In this article, we are analyzing the Ricoh G900 versus Samsung HZ35W, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the G900 (20MP) and HZ35W (12MP) but they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe G900 was introduced 7 years later than the HZ35W and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a brief summary of how the G900 scores against the HZ35W in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh G900 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh G900 & Samsung HZ35W. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh G900 Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Samsung HZ35W
| G900 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2018 |  | June 2010 | Fresher by 94 months |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 614k | Crisper display (+426k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Ricoh G900
| HZ35W | G900 |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh G900 and Samsung HZ35W
| G900 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Ricoh G900 comes with external dimensions of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has proportions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh G900 versus Samsung HZ35W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the G900 and the HZ35W.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the G900 and HZ35W is 89 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to visualize the difference in sensor sizing only by viewing technical specs. The photograph here might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the G900 and HZ35W.
As you can tell, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can anticipate the Ricoh G900 to result in more detail using its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The newer G900 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Ricoh G900 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh G900 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also called as | - | WB650 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2018-02-21 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Flash on, flash off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840x2160 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Supports FlashAir SD cards | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lb) | 245 grams (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | - | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $752 | $300 |