Ricoh G900 vs Samsung NX300
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
86 Imaging
63 Features
73 Overall
67
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung NX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Announced February 2018
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Announced November 2013
- Superseded the Samsung NX210
- New Model is Samsung NX500
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung NX300 Overview
The following is a thorough comparison of the Ricoh G900 vs Samsung NX300, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the G900 (20MP) and the NX300 (20MP) is very comparable but the G900 (1/2.3") and NX300 (APS-C) use totally different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe G900 was launched 4 years after the NX300 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh G900 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the G900 scores versus the NX300 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung NX300 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh G900 & Samsung NX300. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh G900 Gallery & Samsung NX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Samsung NX300
G900 | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | November 2013 | Newer by 52 months | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 768k | Clearer display (+272k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Ricoh G900
NX300 | G900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3.3" | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh G900 and Samsung NX300
G900 | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung NX300 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh G900 comes with outside dimensions of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Samsung NX300 has proportions of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") having a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Check the Ricoh G900 vs Samsung NX300 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the G900 vs the NX300.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the G900 and NX300 is 89 and 86 respectively.
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung NX300 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to see the gap in sensor dimensions merely by seeing specs. The pic here may give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the G900 and NX300.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have got the exact same MP but not the same sensor dimensions. The G900 uses the smaller sensor which should make achieving shallow DOF tougher. The younger G900 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung NX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung NX300 Specifications
Ricoh G900 | Samsung NX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh G900 | Samsung NX300 |
Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2018-02-21 | 2013-11-24 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 247 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3.3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 768k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Flash on, flash off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840x2160 | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Supports FlashAir SD cards | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lb) | 331 grams (0.73 lb) |
Dimensions | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 76 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 942 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photographs | 330 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $752 | $750 |