Ricoh G900 vs Samsung SL202
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Launched February 2018
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Also Known as PL50
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh G900 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Here is a extended comparison of the Ricoh G900 vs Samsung SL202, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the G900 (20MP) and SL202 (10MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe G900 was manufactured 9 years later than the SL202 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief overview of how the G900 matches up vs the SL202 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh G900 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh G900 and Samsung SL202. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh G900 Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Samsung SL202
| G900 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2018 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 110 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Ricoh G900
| SL202 | G900 |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh G900 and Samsung SL202
| G900 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh G900 features outside measurements of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Samsung SL202 has specifications of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh G900 vs Samsung SL202 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the G900 against the SL202.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the G900 and SL202 is 89 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to envision the difference in sensor sizing merely by checking out specs. The photograph below should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the G900 and SL202.
All in all, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Ricoh G900 to produce extra detail due to its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images more aggressively. The newer G900 will have an edge in sensor technology.
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Ricoh G900 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh G900 | Samsung SL202 |
| Also called | - | PL50 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2018-02-21 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | Flash on, flash off | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840x2160 | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Supports FlashAir SD cards | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 lb) | 168 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | - | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $752 | $140 |