Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL210
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
94 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2018
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-135mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Announced January 2010
- Alternative Name is PL150
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL210 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Ricoh G900 and Samsung TL210, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the G900 (20MP) and TL210 (12MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe G900 was unveiled 8 years after the TL210 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Ricoh G900 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL210 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick overview of how the G900 matches up vs the TL210 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL210 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh G900 and Samsung TL210. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh G900 Gallery and Samsung TL210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Samsung TL210
| G900 | TL210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2018 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 99 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL210 over the Ricoh G900
| TL210 | G900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Ricoh G900 and Samsung TL210
| G900 | TL210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL210 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh G900 features external measurements of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Samsung TL210 has dimensions of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh G900 and Samsung TL210 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the G900 and the TL210.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the G900 and TL210 is 89 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL210 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to picture the gap between sensor dimensions merely by checking specifications. The picture here will help give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the G900 and TL210.
Plainly, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Ricoh G900 to give greater detail having an extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The newer G900 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL210 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL210 Specifications
| Ricoh G900 | Samsung TL210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh G900 | Samsung TL210 |
| Also Known as | - | PL150 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2018-02-21 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 27-135mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) | 3.40 m |
| Flash settings | Flash on, flash off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840x2160 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Supports FlashAir SD cards | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 pounds) | 177g (0.39 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | - | SLB-07B |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $752 | $230 |