Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL220
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74efc/74efc246825aff5ab2faab7c06cfeb0ab333069a" alt="Ricoh G900 front Ricoh G900 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c119/1c119c2ec70dec690e2f8a515d1d9ed02a1b482d" alt="Samsung TL220 front Samsung TL220 front"
95 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2018
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 169g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Released August 2009
- Additionally referred to as ST500
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL220 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Ricoh G900 versus Samsung TL220, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the G900 (20MP) and TL220 (12MP) but they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The G900 was brought out 8 years after the TL220 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the G900 scores vs the TL220 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL220 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh G900 & Samsung TL220. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh G900 Gallery & Samsung TL220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Samsung TL220
G900 | TL220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2018 | ![]() | August 2009 | Newer by 104 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+810k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL220 over the Ricoh G900
TL220 | G900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh G900 and Samsung TL220
G900 | TL220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL220 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh G900 offers exterior measurements of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Samsung TL220 has dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 169 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh G900 versus Samsung TL220 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the G900 vs the TL220.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2efc3/2efc3579ae60a1bc7b415faecf03ca7e746e24ca" alt="Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL220 size comparison Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL220 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the G900 and TL220 is 89 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c936b/c936bd0848c5de89506d7091ecc9cc679d6c7923" alt="Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL220 top view buttons comparison Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL220 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL220 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to envision the difference in sensor dimensions just by seeing a spec sheet. The picture below should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the G900 and TL220.
As you can see, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Ricoh G900 to provide extra detail having its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The newer G900 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48ae2/48ae2a7b2a639fa74e5575228737179f4feb0975" alt="Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL220 sensor size comparison Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL220 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL220 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/865f7/865f77467fd9f90ae951a8e49868895b19bf2f6a" alt="Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL220 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL220 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL220 Specifications
Ricoh G900 | Samsung TL220 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh G900 | Samsung TL220 |
Also referred to as | - | ST500 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2018-02-21 | 2009-08-13 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) | 3.40 m |
Flash settings | Flash on, flash off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840x2160 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Supports FlashAir SD cards | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lb) | 169 grams (0.37 lb) |
Dimensions | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | SLB-07A |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $752 | $90 |