Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL225
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
94 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Released February 2018
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Released August 2009
- Additionally Known as ST550
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL225 Overview
Below is a thorough assessment of the Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL225, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the G900 (20MP) and TL225 (12MP) but they feature the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe G900 was announced 8 years later than the TL225 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh G900 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL225 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple view of how the G900 grades vs the TL225 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL225 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh G900 and Samsung TL225. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh G900 Gallery and Samsung TL225 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Samsung TL225
| G900 | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2018 |  | August 2009 | More recent by 104 months |
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Ricoh G900
| TL225 | G900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 1152k |  | 1040k | Crisper display (+112k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh G900 and Samsung TL225
| G900 | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh G900 has outer measurements of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Samsung TL225 has sizing of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") with a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL225 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the G900 and the TL225.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the G900 and TL225 is 89 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements just by checking out a spec sheet. The visual underneath may give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the G900 and TL225.
As you can see, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Ricoh G900 to provide more detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics a little more aggressively. The fresher G900 is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL225 Specifications
| Ricoh G900 | Samsung TL225 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh G900 | Samsung TL225 |
| Otherwise known as | - | ST550 |
| Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2018-02-21 | 2009-08-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dot | 1,152 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) | 3.40 m |
| Flash modes | Flash on, flash off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840x2160 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Supports FlashAir SD cards | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 pounds) | 187g (0.41 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 pictures | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | - | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $752 | $488 |