Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL320
89 Imaging
46 Features
46 Overall
46
98 Imaging
34 Features
36 Overall
34
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Announced February 2018
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Announced February 2009
- Other Name is WB1000
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL320 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Ricoh G900 and Samsung TL320, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the G900 (20MP) and TL320 (12MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe G900 was revealed 9 years after the TL320 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh G900 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the G900 matches up against the TL320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh G900 and Samsung TL320. The full galleries are available at Ricoh G900 Gallery and Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Samsung TL320
| G900 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2018 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 110 months |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+580k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Ricoh G900
| TL320 | G900 |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh G900 and Samsung TL320
| G900 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither includes Touch display |
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh G900 features exterior dimensions of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Samsung TL320 has dimensions of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh G900 and Samsung TL320 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use during that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the G900 vs the TL320.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the G900 and TL320 is 89 and 98 respectively.
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions just by researching technical specs. The picture below should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the G900 and TL320.
As you can tell, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Ricoh G900 to render extra detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The younger G900 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
| Ricoh G900 | Samsung TL320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh G900 | Samsung TL320 |
| Also referred to as | - | WB1000 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2018-02-21 | 2009-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Flash on, flash off | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840x2160 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Supports FlashAir SD cards | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 lb) | - |
| Dimensions | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 shots | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $752 | $380 |