Ricoh G900 vs Samsung WB150F
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
93 Imaging
38 Features
42 Overall
39
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2018
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh G900 vs Samsung WB150F Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Ricoh G900 vs Samsung WB150F, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the G900 (20MP) and WB150F (14MP) but they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe G900 was launched 6 years later than the WB150F and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise summary of how the G900 scores versus the WB150F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Ricoh G900 vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh G900 & Samsung WB150F. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh G900 Gallery & Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Samsung WB150F
| G900 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2018 |  | January 2012 | More recent by 75 months |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+580k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Ricoh G900
| WB150F | G900 |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh G900 and Samsung WB150F
| G900 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh G900 comes with exterior dimensions of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Samsung WB150F has measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh G900 vs Samsung WB150F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the G900 compared to the WB150F.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the G900 and WB150F is 89 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to see the gap between sensor measurements simply by reading technical specs. The visual below might give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the G900 and WB150F.
As you can tell, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Ricoh G900 to deliver extra detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots much more aggressively. The newer G900 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
| Ricoh G900 | Samsung WB150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh G900 | Samsung WB150F |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2018-02-21 | 2012-01-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Flash on, flash off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840x2160 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Supports FlashAir SD cards | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lb) | 188 grams (0.41 lb) |
| Dimensions | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | - | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $752 | $230 |
