Ricoh G900 vs Samsung WB210
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2018
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched July 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh G900 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Below is a detailed review of the Ricoh G900 vs Samsung WB210, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the G900 (20MP) and WB210 (14MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe G900 was revealed 6 years later than the WB210 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the G900 matches up against the WB210 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh G900 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh G900 & Samsung WB210. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh G900 Gallery & Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Samsung WB210
| G900 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2018 |  | July 2011 | More recent by 81 months |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 1k | Sharper screen (+1039k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Ricoh G900
| WB210 | G900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh G900 and Samsung WB210
| G900 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh G900 features external dimensions of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Samsung WB210 has dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh G900 vs Samsung WB210 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Here is a front view size comparison of the G900 against the WB210.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the G900 and WB210 is 89 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to picture the contrast in sensor measurements simply by viewing specs. The photograph underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the G900 and WB210.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can count on the Ricoh G900 to provide you with extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs way more aggressively. The more modern G900 provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Ricoh G900 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh G900 | Samsung WB210 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2018-02-21 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 1 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Flash on, flash off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840x2160 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Supports FlashAir SD cards | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 lbs) | 174g (0.38 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 pictures | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $752 | $279 |