Ricoh GR Digital III vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Announced July 2009
- Replacement is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
- Successor is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Ricoh GR Digital III and Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof and both are offered by Ricoh. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") possess different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe GR Digital III was released 5 years prior to the WG-4 GPS which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a full comparison, below is a short introduction of how the GR Digital III scores against the WG-4 GPS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR Digital III & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
GR Digital III | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Ricoh GR Digital III
WG-4 GPS | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | July 2009 | Newer by 55 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
GR Digital III | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display size | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh GR Digital III provides exterior measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GR Digital III and Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at the time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the GR Digital III against the WG-4 GPS.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital III and WG-4 GPS is 92 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions purely by researching specifications. The pic below will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital III and WG-4 GPS.
Plainly, both of those cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The GR Digital III due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS will provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Ricoh |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital III | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Announced | 2009-07-27 | 2014-02-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 208 gr (0.46 lbs) | 235 gr (0.52 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $399 | $210 |