Ricoh GR Digital III vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
90 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Refreshed by Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Superseded the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-6
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are created by Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and WG-5 GPS (16MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and WG-5 GPS (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe GR Digital III was released 6 years before the WG-5 GPS which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple summation of how the GR Digital III scores versus the WG-5 GPS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR Digital III & Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery & Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
GR Digital III | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Ricoh GR Digital III
WG-5 GPS | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2015 | July 2009 | More modern by 67 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
GR Digital III | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR Digital III enjoys exterior dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has proportions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the GR Digital III versus the WG-5 GPS.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital III and WG-5 GPS is 92 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes purely by going through specs. The pic below will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the GR Digital III and WG-5 GPS.
All in all, both cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital III due to its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS will show more detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Ricoh |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital III | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2009-07-27 | 2015-02-10 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 14.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 208g (0.46 lb) | 236g (0.52 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 shots |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $399 | $500 |