Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
90 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Released July 2009
- Refreshed by Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 283g - 133 x 71 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2014
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Samsung Galaxy Camera 2, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and Galaxy Camera 2 (16MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and Galaxy Camera 2 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe GR Digital III was manufactured 5 years earlier than the Galaxy Camera 2 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the GR Digital III grades vs the Galaxy Camera 2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung Galaxy Camera 2. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery and Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
GR Digital III | Galaxy Camera 2 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
Galaxy Camera 2 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | July 2009 | More modern by 54 months | |
Display sizing | 4.8" | 3" | Larger display (+1.8") | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 920k | Crisper display (+117k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
GR Digital III | Galaxy Camera 2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR Digital III features exterior dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 has sizing of 133mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.2" x 2.8" x 0.7") and a weight of 283 grams (0.62 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the GR Digital III and the Galaxy Camera 2.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital III and Galaxy Camera 2 is 92 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to envision the difference between sensor sizes just by going over a spec sheet. The image here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the GR Digital III and Galaxy Camera 2.
Clearly, the 2 cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital III featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 will offer greater detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2009-07-27 | 2014-01-02 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | GR engine III | 1.6GHz Quad-Core Exynos |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 4.8 inch |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | - | HD Super Clear Touch Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1s | 16s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 3.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, fill-in, slow sync, flash off, redeye fix |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 208 grams (0.46 lbs) | 283 grams (0.62 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 133 x 71 x 19mm (5.2" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 pictures |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | Built-in |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 5, or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $399 | $400 |