Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Announced July 2009
- Replacement is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Introduced August 2012
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and Galaxy Camera 3G (16MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and Galaxy Camera 3G (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe GR Digital III was released 4 years prior to the Galaxy Camera 3G which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the GR Digital III scores vs the Galaxy Camera 3G for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
GR Digital III | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 0k | Sharper screen (+920k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G over the Ricoh GR Digital III
Galaxy Camera 3G | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2012 | July 2009 | Newer by 37 months | |
Screen sizing | 4.8" | 3" | Bigger screen (+1.8") | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
GR Digital III | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR Digital III features outer measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G has measurements of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the GR Digital III and the Galaxy Camera 3G.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital III and Galaxy Camera 3G is 92 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to see the gap in sensor dimensions simply by checking out specifications. The pic here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the GR Digital III and Galaxy Camera 3G.
Plainly, each of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The GR Digital III due to its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G will produce extra detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2009-07-27 | 2012-08-29 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | GR engine III | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | - |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 4.8" |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1s | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 208 gr (0.46 lbs) | 305 gr (0.67 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $399 | $606 |