Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung HZ25W

Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34
Ricoh GR Digital III front
 
Samsung HZ25W front
Portability
70
Imaging
35
Features
32
Overall
33

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung HZ25W Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Launched July 2009
  • Successor is Ricoh GR Digital IV
Samsung HZ25W
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
  • 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
  • Revealed July 2010
  • Alternative Name is WB5000
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung HZ25W Overview

The following is a thorough comparison of the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung HZ25W, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the GR Digital III (10MP) and the HZ25W (12MP) is relatively similar but the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and HZ25W (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizing.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The GR Digital III was revealed 11 months prior to the HZ25W so they are of a similar age. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a short view of how the GR Digital III grades vs the HZ25W in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Samsung HZ25W

 GR Digital III HZ25W 
Screen resolution920k230kSharper screen (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Ricoh GR Digital III

 HZ25W GR Digital III 
RevealedJuly 2010July 2009Newer by 11 months

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung HZ25W

 GR Digital III HZ25W 
Manual focus Very precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen measurement
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch screen No Touch screen

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung HZ25W Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR Digital III has physical measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Samsung HZ25W has measurements of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).

Check out the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung HZ25W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that moment. Here is the front view scale comparison of the GR Digital III and the HZ25W.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung HZ25W size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital III and HZ25W is 92 and 70 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung HZ25W top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung HZ25W Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be hard to see the gap between sensor dimensions just by reviewing specifications. The image here might provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital III and HZ25W.

To sum up, the two cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The GR Digital III having a bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Samsung HZ25W will offer you extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung HZ25W sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung HZ25W as a Portrait photography camera
40
has manual focus
exports RAW files
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
34
you can focus manually
exports RAW files
no manual control
external flash not possible
low megapixels (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Street photography highlights
Samsung HZ25W Street photography highlights
55
exports RAW files
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
very small sensor (1/1.7")
55
image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW files
no moving screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Ricoh GR Digital III
Sports photography with Samsung HZ25W
17
fixed focal length (28mm)
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
has no phase detect auto focus
34
long zoom range (26-624mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
lack of shutter priority mode
low megapixels (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Travel photography information
Samsung HZ25W Travel photography information
63
flash built-in
great max aperture (f1.9)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
52
built-in flash
decently wide (26mm)
very long zoom (624mm)
missing Time Lapse function
low megapixels (12MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Ricoh GR Digital III
Landscape photography with Samsung HZ25W
45
has manual focus
great max aperture (f1.9)
pretty good screen size (3")
exports RAW files
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
43
you can focus manually
decently wide (26mm)
screen is a good size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
no manual control
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
missing Time Lapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III as a Vlogging camera
Samsung HZ25W as a Vlogging camera
25
great max aperture (f1.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have microphone support
24
decently wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing mic socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung HZ25W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung HZ25W
 Ricoh GR Digital IIISamsung HZ25W
General Information
Make Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GR Digital III Samsung HZ25W
Also called as - WB5000
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2009-07-27 2010-07-06
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip GR engine III -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Highest boosted ISO - 6400
Minimum native ISO 64 64
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) 26-624mm (24.0x)
Largest aperture f/1.9 f/2.8-5.0
Macro focus range 1cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3" 3"
Resolution of display 920 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1 seconds 16 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.00 m 5.60 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format - Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 208 gr (0.46 pounds) 428 gr (0.94 pounds)
Dimensions 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SC/SDHC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $399 $350