Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung HZ50W
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
70 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung HZ50W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Successor is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
- Announced May 2010
- Alternate Name is WB5500
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung HZ50W Overview
Below is a detailed overview of the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung HZ50W, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and HZ50W (14MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and HZ50W (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe GR Digital III was launched 9 months prior to the HZ50W so they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Samsung HZ50W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the GR Digital III matches up vs the HZ50W with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung HZ50W Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung HZ50W. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery and Samsung HZ50W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Samsung HZ50W
| GR Digital III | HZ50W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ50W over the Ricoh GR Digital III
| HZ50W | GR Digital III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2010 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 9 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung HZ50W
| GR Digital III | HZ50W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung HZ50W Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR Digital III offers external dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ50W has dimensions of 116mm x 83mm x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung HZ50W in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the GR Digital III and the HZ50W.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital III and HZ50W is 92 and 70 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung HZ50W Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to picture the difference between sensor measurements only by reading a spec sheet. The visual here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the GR Digital III and HZ50W.
Clearly, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The GR Digital III due to its larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Samsung HZ50W will deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos much more aggressively. The older GR Digital III is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung HZ50W Specifications
| Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung HZ50W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung HZ50W |
| Also referred to as | - | WB5500 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-07-27 | 2010-05-03 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | GR engine III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 920k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1 secs | 16 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 5.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 208g (0.46 pounds) | 426g (0.94 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $399 | $250 |