Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX200
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
90 Imaging
61 Features
57 Overall
59
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Successor is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 223g - 117 x 63 x 36mm
- Introduced February 2012
- Replaced the Samsung NX100
- Updated by Samsung NX210
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX200 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung NX200, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and NX200 (20MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and NX200 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe GR Digital III was brought out 3 years earlier than the NX200 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a short overview of how the GR Digital III scores against the NX200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX200 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR Digital III & Samsung NX200. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery & Samsung NX200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Samsung NX200
GR Digital III | NX200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 614k | Sharper screen (+306k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX200 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
NX200 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2012 | July 2009 | Fresher by 31 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung NX200
GR Digital III | NX200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX200 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR Digital III features outer measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Samsung NX200 has dimensions of 117mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") with a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung NX200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the GR Digital III against the NX200.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital III and NX200 is 92 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reading through a spec sheet. The visual below should provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital III and NX200.
As you can see, the 2 cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The GR Digital III featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Samsung NX200 will give greater detail having its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older GR Digital III is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX200 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung NX200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung NX200 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2009-07-27 | 2012-02-28 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Max aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 920k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 7.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 208 grams (0.46 lbs) | 223 grams (0.49 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 117 x 63 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 69 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 618 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BC1030 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $399 | $818 |