Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX300

Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34
Ricoh GR Digital III front
 
Samsung NX300 front
Portability
86
Imaging
63
Features
73
Overall
67

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX300 Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Announced July 2009
  • Successor is Ricoh GR Digital IV
Samsung NX300
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3.3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1/6000s Max Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Samsung NX Mount
  • 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
  • Revealed November 2013
  • Older Model is Samsung NX210
  • Successor is Samsung NX500
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX300 Overview

Here is a complete review of the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX300, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and NX300 (20MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and NX300 (APS-C) use different sensor sizes.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The GR Digital III was revealed 5 years prior to the NX300 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the GR Digital III scores vs the NX300 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Samsung NX300

 GR Digital III NX300 
Display resolution920k768kClearer display (+152k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Ricoh GR Digital III

 NX300 GR Digital III 
RevealedNovember 2013July 2009Fresher by 52 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display sizing3.3"3"Larger display (+0.3")
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung NX300

 GR Digital III NX300 
Manual focus Dial precise focus
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX300 Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR Digital III has got physical dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Samsung NX300 has proportions of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") along with a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).

Take a look at the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX300 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have at the time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the GR Digital III compared to the NX300.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX300 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital III and NX300 is 92 and 86 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX300 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX300 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing only by going over technical specs. The visual here should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital III and NX300.

As you can tell, both the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The GR Digital III with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Samsung NX300 will offer you more detail because of its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics far more aggressively. The older GR Digital III is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX300 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX300 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung NX300 as a Portrait photography camera
40
has manual focus
saves RAW files
MP count low (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
77
focusing manually
MP count decent (20MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
provides face detect focusing
exports RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Street photography details
Samsung NX300 Street photography details
55
saves RAW files
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
80
screen tilts
nice sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
has focus via touch
good ISO range (25,600)
no image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Sports photography advice
Samsung NX300 Sports photography advice
17
fixed focal length (28mm)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect auto focus
73
high shutter speed (1/6,000 seconds)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
provides tracking focus
has phase detect AF
no image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Travel photography highlights
Samsung NX300 Travel photography highlights
63
has built in flash
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
MP count low (10MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
67
has focus via touch
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
does not have Timelapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Landscape photography highlights
Samsung NX300 Landscape photography highlights
45
has manual focus
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
saves RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
72
focusing manually
change lenses (Samsung NX mount)
nice screen size (3.3")
MP count decent (20MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
good ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
no image stabilization
does not have Timelapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III as a Vlogging camera
Samsung NX300 as a Vlogging camera
25
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external mic jack
33
touchscreen capability
provides face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
does not have microphone jack
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung NX300
 Ricoh GR Digital IIISamsung NX300
General Information
Brand Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GR Digital III Samsung NX300
Class Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level Mirrorless
Announced 2009-07-27 2013-11-24
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip GR engine III DRIMe IV
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" APS-C
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 5472 x 3648
Highest native ISO 1600 25600
Lowest native ISO 64 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 247
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Samsung NX
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) -
Max aperture f/1.9 -
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Total lenses - 32
Focal length multiplier 4.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen size 3 inch 3.3 inch
Screen resolution 920k dot 768k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen tech - Active Matrix OLED screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/6000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 9.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.00 m no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync - 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Optional
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 208 grams (0.46 pounds) 331 grams (0.73 pounds)
Dimensions 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 76
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.6
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.7
DXO Low light score not tested 942
Other
Battery life - 330 photos
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - BP1130
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 sec to 30 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Price at launch $399 $750