Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX300
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
86 Imaging
63 Features
73 Overall
67
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Announced July 2009
- Successor is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Revealed November 2013
- Older Model is Samsung NX210
- Successor is Samsung NX500
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX300 Overview
Here is a complete review of the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX300, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and NX300 (20MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and NX300 (APS-C) use different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe GR Digital III was revealed 5 years prior to the NX300 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the GR Digital III scores vs the NX300 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX300 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung NX300. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery and Samsung NX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Samsung NX300
GR Digital III | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 768k | Clearer display (+152k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
NX300 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | November 2013 | July 2009 | Fresher by 52 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3.3" | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung NX300
GR Digital III | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX300 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR Digital III has got physical dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Samsung NX300 has proportions of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") along with a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX300 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have at the time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the GR Digital III compared to the NX300.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital III and NX300 is 92 and 86 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX300 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing only by going over technical specs. The visual here should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital III and NX300.
As you can tell, both the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The GR Digital III with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Samsung NX300 will offer you more detail because of its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics far more aggressively. The older GR Digital III is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX300 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung NX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung NX300 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2009-07-27 | 2013-11-24 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | GR engine III | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 247 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Max aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3.3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 768k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 208 grams (0.46 pounds) | 331 grams (0.73 pounds) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 76 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 942 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $399 | $750 |