Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX300M
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
86 Imaging
62 Features
73 Overall
66
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX300M Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Successor is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Released January 2013
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX300M Overview
Following is a thorough analysis of the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung NX300M, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and NX300M (20MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and NX300M (APS-C) possess totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe GR Digital III was announced 4 years before the NX300M which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX300M being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the GR Digital III matches up versus the NX300M in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX300M Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung NX300M. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery and Samsung NX300M Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Samsung NX300M
GR Digital III | NX300M | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 768k | Crisper screen (+152k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300M over the Ricoh GR Digital III
NX300M | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | July 2009 | More modern by 41 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3.3" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung NX300M
GR Digital III | NX300M | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX300M Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR Digital III has outer measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Samsung NX300M has proportions of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") having a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung NX300M in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using at that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the GR Digital III vs the NX300M.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital III and NX300M is 92 and 86 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX300M Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to envision the gap between sensor sizes only by checking specifications. The image below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital III and NX300M.
Plainly, the two cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital III using its tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Samsung NX300M will give greater detail with its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX300M Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX300M Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung NX300M | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung NX300M |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2009-07-27 | 2013-01-03 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | GR engine III | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 247 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3.3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 768k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/6000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 208g (0.46 lbs) | 331g (0.73 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $399 | $699 |