Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung PL120
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
99 Imaging
37 Features
20 Overall
30
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung PL120 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Introduced July 2009
- New Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 94 x 54 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2011
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung PL120 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung PL120, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and PL120 (14MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and PL120 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe GR Digital III was released 17 months earlier than the PL120 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Samsung PL120 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short highlight of how the GR Digital III grades versus the PL120 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung PL120 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR Digital III & Samsung PL120. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery & Samsung PL120 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Samsung PL120
GR Digital III | PL120 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL120 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
PL120 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2011 | July 2009 | More recent by 17 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung PL120
GR Digital III | PL120 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung PL120 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh GR Digital III provides physical dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) and the Samsung PL120 has specifications of 94mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung PL120 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the GR Digital III compared to the PL120.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital III and PL120 is 92 and 99 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung PL120 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to envision the gap in sensor measurements only by viewing specs. The visual here will help give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital III and PL120.
All in all, both of those cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The GR Digital III featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Samsung PL120 will result in greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The older GR Digital III will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung PL120 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung PL120 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung PL120 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung PL120 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2009-07-27 | 2011-01-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | - |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | () |
Maximal aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 208 grams (0.46 pounds) | - |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 94 x 54 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
Card slots | 1 | - |
Retail cost | $399 | $150 |