Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL102
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34


96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Updated by Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
- Also referred to as ES55

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung SL102, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the GR Digital III (10MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is pretty close but the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and SL102 (1/2.3") boast different sensor dimensions.

The GR Digital III was brought out 7 months after the SL102 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the GR Digital III matches up vs the SL102 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung SL102. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Samsung SL102
GR Digital III | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2009 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 7 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
SL102 | GR Digital III |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung SL102
GR Digital III | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR Digital III comes with physical measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has measurements of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
See the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung SL102 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the GR Digital III against the SL102.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital III and SL102 is 92 and 96 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions merely by viewing specs. The picture underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the GR Digital III and SL102.
All in all, both of these cameras feature the identical resolution albeit different sensor dimensions. The GR Digital III comes with the bigger sensor which should make achieving shallower depth of field simpler. The more modern GR Digital III should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung SL102 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung SL102 |
Also called as | - | ES55 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-07-27 | 2009-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Display resolution | 920k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 208 grams (0.46 lbs) | 116 grams (0.26 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $399 | $130 |