Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL202
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Launched July 2009
- Later Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Other Name is PL50
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Samsung SL202, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the GR Digital III (10MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is very similar but the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and SL202 (1/2.3") have different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe GR Digital III was announced 6 months after the SL202 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the GR Digital III grades against the SL202 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR Digital III & Samsung SL202. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Samsung SL202
| GR Digital III | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
| SL202 | GR Digital III |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung SL202
| GR Digital III | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2009 |  | February 2009 | Similar age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR Digital III has physical measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) and the Samsung SL202 has proportions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Samsung SL202 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the GR Digital III and the SL202.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital III and SL202 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing technical specs. The picture underneath should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the GR Digital III and SL202.
As you have seen, each of these cameras come with the identical megapixels but different sensor dimensions. The GR Digital III has got the larger sensor which will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung SL202 |
| Otherwise known as | - | PL50 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-07-27 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | GR engine III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 208 gr (0.46 pounds) | 168 gr (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $399 | $140 |
