Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL620
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0394/c039434b1259b0983aa2fa353205f299c35090eb" alt="Ricoh GR Digital III front Ricoh GR Digital III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/580aa/580aa8066e7f6a587d8495dc4afcf7f471af7c1b" alt="Samsung SL620 front Samsung SL620 front"
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Later Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Additionally referred to as PL65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL620 Overview
Following is a in depth comparison of the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Samsung SL620, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the GR Digital III (10MP) and the SL620 (12MP) is very similar but the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and SL620 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The GR Digital III was released 6 months after the SL620 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summation of how the GR Digital III scores vs the SL620 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung SL620. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery and Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Samsung SL620
GR Digital III | SL620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
SL620 | GR Digital III |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung SL620
GR Digital III | SL620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2009 | ![]() | February 2009 | Similar generation |
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR Digital III provides outer dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) and the Samsung SL620 has proportions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Samsung SL620 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the GR Digital III versus the SL620.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce254/ce2540b9d2f4e6193bddd3d0036ff29cb094c978" alt="Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL620 size comparison Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL620 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital III and SL620 is 92 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf10e/bf10ecdbe1644b312f10c10d2055f686a6d5ddcc" alt="Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL620 top view buttons comparison Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL620 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to see the gap between sensor sizes purely by reviewing specs. The picture below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital III and SL620.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital III featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Samsung SL620 will offer you greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos far more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/603df/603df07da87e22dd90e0ea1e0b4ce1db85800d60" alt="Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL620 sensor size comparison Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL620 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa9e7/fa9e76e6310bdd61c559748d5ddeb20d7f69d020" alt="Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL620 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL620 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung SL620 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung SL620 |
Otherwise known as | - | PL65 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2009-07-27 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 4.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 208 gr (0.46 pounds) | 168 gr (0.37 pounds) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $399 | $200 |