Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL620

Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34
Ricoh GR Digital III front
 
Samsung SL620 front
Portability
94
Imaging
34
Features
13
Overall
25

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Introduced July 2009
  • Later Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
Samsung SL620
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Launched February 2009
  • Additionally referred to as PL65
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL620 Overview

Following is a in depth comparison of the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Samsung SL620, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the GR Digital III (10MP) and the SL620 (12MP) is very similar but the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and SL620 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor measurements.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The GR Digital III was released 6 months after the SL620 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summation of how the GR Digital III scores vs the SL620 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Samsung SL620

 GR Digital III SL620 
Manually focus Dial accurate focusing
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kCrisper display (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Ricoh GR Digital III

 SL620 GR Digital III 

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung SL620

 GR Digital III SL620 
LaunchedJuly 2009February 2009Similar generation
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither provides Touch friendly display

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to carry around your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR Digital III provides outer dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) and the Samsung SL620 has proportions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).

See the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Samsung SL620 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the GR Digital III versus the SL620.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL620 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital III and SL620 is 92 and 94 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL620 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be tough to see the gap between sensor sizes purely by reviewing specs. The picture below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital III and SL620.

As you can plainly see, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital III featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Samsung SL620 will offer you greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos far more aggressively.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL620 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL620 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung SL620 as a Portrait photography camera
40
manual focus
supports RAW files
MP count low (10MP)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
26
offers face detect focus
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Street photography factors
Samsung SL620 Street photography factors
55
supports RAW files
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
sensor is small (1/1.7")
47
no moving screen
no image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
more heavy than competitors (168 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Ricoh GR Digital III
Sports photography with Samsung SL620
17
fixed focal length (28mm)
no image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect AF
17
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Travel photography details
Samsung SL620 Travel photography details
63
has built in flash
fast maximum aperture (f1.9)
MP count low (10MP)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
50
flash built-in
no Timelapse function
more heavy than competitors (168 grams)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Landscape photography details
Samsung SL620 Landscape photography details
45
manual focus
fast maximum aperture (f1.9)
screen size is good (3 inches)
supports RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
no image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
23
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not available
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
no Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Vlogging factors
Samsung SL620 Vlogging factors
25
fast maximum aperture (f1.9)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pxls)
missing external mic socket
24
offers face detect focus
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
no microphone support
more heavy than competitors (168g)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung SL620 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung SL620
 Ricoh GR Digital IIISamsung SL620
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GR Digital III Samsung SL620
Otherwise known as - PL65
Type Small Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Introduced 2009-07-27 2009-02-17
Physical type Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor GR engine III -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 -
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Lowest native ISO 64 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) 35-175mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/1.9 f/2.8-5.7
Macro focus distance 1cm 5cm
Crop factor 4.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 920k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1 secs 8 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.00 m 4.60 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 208 gr (0.46 pounds) 168 gr (0.37 pounds)
Dimensions 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch price $399 $200