Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung ST65

Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34
Ricoh GR Digital III front
 
Samsung ST65 front
Portability
99
Imaging
37
Features
19
Overall
29

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Announced July 2009
  • Replacement is Ricoh GR Digital IV
Samsung ST65
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Introduced January 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung ST65 Overview

Here is a detailed assessment of the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung ST65, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and ST65 (14MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and ST65 (1/2.3") come with different sensor size.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The GR Digital III was revealed 18 months prior to the ST65 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a brief overview of how the GR Digital III matches up vs the ST65 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Samsung ST65

 GR Digital III ST65 
Manual focus More exact focus
Display resolution920k460kSharper display (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Ricoh GR Digital III

 ST65 GR Digital III 
IntroducedJanuary 2011July 2009Fresher by 18 months

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung ST65

 GR Digital III ST65 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display size
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch display Neither offers Touch display

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR Digital III offers physical dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST65 has dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Contrast the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung ST65 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the GR Digital III compared to the ST65.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung ST65 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital III and ST65 is 92 and 99 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung ST65 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizing simply by looking at specifications. The visual underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital III and ST65.

Plainly, the 2 cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GR Digital III using its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Samsung ST65 will give you more detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The older GR Digital III is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung ST65 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung ST65 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung ST65 as a Portrait photography camera
40
focusing manually
saves RAW formats
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
28
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Street photography advice
Samsung ST65 Street photography advice
55
saves RAW formats
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
49
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
max ISO too low (0)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Sports photography highlights
Samsung ST65 Sports photography highlights
17
can't change focal length (28mm)
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
26
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
fixed focal length (()mm)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Ricoh GR Digital III
Travel photography with Samsung ST65
63
flash built-in
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
megapixel count low (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
71
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
has built in flash
great max aperture (f)
no Timelapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Landscape photography factors
Samsung ST65 Landscape photography factors
45
focusing manually
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
saves RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
37
great max aperture (f)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (()mm)
manual exposure not possible
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (0)
does not have RAW format
no Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Vlogging highlights
Samsung ST65 Vlogging highlights
25
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have microphone jack
27
great max aperture (f)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
no external microphone support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung ST65 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung ST65
 Ricoh GR Digital IIISamsung ST65
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GR Digital III Samsung ST65
Type Small Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Announced 2009-07-27 2011-01-19
Physical type Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip GR engine III -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 -
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 64 -
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28mm (1x) ()
Highest aperture f/1.9 -
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Screen resolution 920 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (optional) None
Features
Min shutter speed 1 seconds 8 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.00 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual -
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 208g (0.46 pounds) -
Dimensions 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal -
Card slots One One
Price at release $399 $130