Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung TL350
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Launched July 2009
- Later Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched February 2010
- Alternate Name is WB2000
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung TL350 Overview
Here, we are matching up the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Samsung TL350, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the GR Digital III (10MP) and the TL350 (10MP) is very comparable but the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and TL350 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe GR Digital III was unveiled 6 months prior to the TL350 so they are of a similar age. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short highlight of how the GR Digital III grades versus the TL350 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR Digital III & Samsung TL350. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery & Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Samsung TL350
| GR Digital III | TL350 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
| TL350 | GR Digital III |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung TL350
| GR Digital III | TL350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2009 |  | February 2010 | Same age |
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display dimensions |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 920k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR Digital III has exterior measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL350 has sizing of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Samsung TL350 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the GR Digital III compared to the TL350.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital III and TL350 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to see the gap in sensor sizes merely by checking out specs. The picture here will give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital III and TL350.
All in all, both cameras come with the identical MP but not the same sensor sizes. The GR Digital III uses the larger sensor which should make achieving shallower depth of field easier.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
| Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung TL350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung TL350 |
| Also Known as | - | WB2000 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-07-27 | 2010-02-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | GR engine III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.4-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 16 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 5.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 208g (0.46 lb) | 195g (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $399 | $400 |
