Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB1100F
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34


67 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB1100F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Announced July 2009
- Newer Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 512g - 125 x 87 x 96mm
- Revealed January 2014

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB1100F Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Samsung WB1100F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and WB1100F (16MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and WB1100F (1/2.3") have totally different sensor size.

The GR Digital III was brought out 5 years earlier than the WB1100F and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB1100F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a short overview of how the GR Digital III grades against the WB1100F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB1100F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR Digital III & Samsung WB1100F. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery & Samsung WB1100F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Samsung WB1100F
GR Digital III | WB1100F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB1100F over the Ricoh GR Digital III
WB1100F | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 54 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung WB1100F
GR Digital III | WB1100F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Absent Touch screen |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB1100F Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR Digital III features physical dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Samsung WB1100F has measurements of 125mm x 87mm x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") with a weight of 512 grams (1.13 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Samsung WB1100F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the GR Digital III compared to the WB1100F.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital III and WB1100F is 92 and 67 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB1100F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to visualise the gap between sensor measurements only by going over specifications. The graphic here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital III and WB1100F.
To sum up, both of those cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The GR Digital III because of its bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh simpler and the Samsung WB1100F will offer extra detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older GR Digital III is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB1100F Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB1100F Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung WB1100F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung WB1100F |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2009-07-27 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 25-875mm (35.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/1.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 208g (0.46 lb) | 512g (1.13 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 125 x 87 x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $399 | $250 |