Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB150F
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34


93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Announced July 2009
- Renewed by Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Released January 2012

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB150F Overview
Here, we are looking at the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Samsung WB150F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and WB150F (14MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and WB150F (1/2.3") boast different sensor measurements.

The GR Digital III was announced 3 years before the WB150F and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a quick summary of how the GR Digital III scores versus the WB150F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR Digital III & Samsung WB150F. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery & Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Samsung WB150F
GR Digital III | WB150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Ricoh GR Digital III
WB150F | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2012 | ![]() | July 2009 | Fresher by 29 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung WB150F
GR Digital III | WB150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR Digital III offers physical measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB150F has measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Samsung WB150F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the GR Digital III versus the WB150F.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital III and WB150F is 92 and 93 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizing only by checking out specs. The graphic here will help give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital III and WB150F.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The GR Digital III with its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Samsung WB150F will provide extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older GR Digital III will be behind in sensor innovation.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung WB150F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung WB150F |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2009-07-27 | 2012-01-09 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/1.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1s | 16s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 208 gr (0.46 pounds) | 188 gr (0.41 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $399 | $230 |