Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB150F

Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34
Ricoh GR Digital III front
 
Samsung WB150F front
Portability
93
Imaging
38
Features
42
Overall
39

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Announced July 2009
  • Renewed by Ricoh GR Digital IV
Samsung WB150F
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
  • Released January 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB150F Overview

Here, we are looking at the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Samsung WB150F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and WB150F (14MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and WB150F (1/2.3") boast different sensor measurements.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The GR Digital III was announced 3 years before the WB150F and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a quick summary of how the GR Digital III scores versus the WB150F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Samsung WB150F

 GR Digital III WB150F 
Display resolution920k460kClearer display (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Ricoh GR Digital III

 WB150F GR Digital III 
ReleasedJanuary 2012July 2009Fresher by 29 months

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung WB150F

 GR Digital III WB150F 
Manual focus Dial exact focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display measurements
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither offers Touch friendly display

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison

When you are intending to carry your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR Digital III offers physical measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB150F has measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).

Contrast the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Samsung WB150F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the GR Digital III versus the WB150F.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB150F size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital III and WB150F is 92 and 93 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB150F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizing only by checking out specs. The graphic here will help give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital III and WB150F.

As you can plainly see, both of those cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The GR Digital III with its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Samsung WB150F will provide extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older GR Digital III will be behind in sensor innovation.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB150F sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Portrait photography highlights
Samsung WB150F Portrait photography highlights
40
has manual focus
saves RAW formats
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
42
focusing manually
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
comes with face detect autofocus
no external flash support
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Street photography information
Samsung WB150F Street photography information
55
saves RAW formats
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (188g)
no articulating screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Sports photography factors
Samsung WB150F Sports photography factors
17
can't change focal length (28mm)
no image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
has no phase detect AF
52
long zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
comes with tracking focus
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Travel photography info
Samsung WB150F Travel photography info
63
flash built-in
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
69
lighter than average in class (188 grams)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (24mm)
great reach (432mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
does not contain selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Landscape photography information
Samsung WB150F Landscape photography information
45
has manual focus
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
screen is a decent size (3")
saves RAW formats
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
no image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
49
focusing manually
reasonably wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III as a Vlogging camera
Samsung WB150F as a Vlogging camera
25
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
missing external microphone jack
32
reasonably wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detect autofocus
lighter than average in class (188g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have mic jack
Photography Glossary

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB150F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung WB150F
 Ricoh GR Digital IIISamsung WB150F
General Information
Company Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GR Digital III Samsung WB150F
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2009-07-27 2012-01-09
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip GR engine III -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 64 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28mm (1x) 24-432mm (18.0x)
Highest aperture f/1.9 f/3.2-5.8
Macro focusing range 1cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 920k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 1s 16s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed - 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 3.50 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format - MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 208 gr (0.46 pounds) 188 gr (0.41 pounds)
Physical dimensions 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Launch pricing $399 $230