Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB35F
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Launched July 2009
- New Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2014
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung WB35F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and WB35F (16MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and WB35F (1/2.3") use totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe GR Digital III was released 5 years earlier than the WB35F and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise overview of how the GR Digital III scores versus the WB35F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR Digital III & Samsung WB35F. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Samsung WB35F
GR Digital III | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Ricoh GR Digital III
WB35F | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | July 2009 | More recent by 54 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung WB35F
GR Digital III | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR Digital III offers outside measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Samsung WB35F has proportions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung WB35F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the GR Digital III against the WB35F.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital III and WB35F is 92 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to see the gap in sensor measurements only by looking through technical specs. The photograph underneath may provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital III and WB35F.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The GR Digital III due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Samsung WB35F will render more detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images much more aggressively. The older GR Digital III will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung WB35F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung WB35F |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-07-27 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Max aperture | f/1.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 208 grams (0.46 lbs) | 194 grams (0.43 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $399 | $130 |