Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB50F
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Launched July 2009
- Replacement is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2014
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Below, we are comparing the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB50F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and WB50F (16MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and WB50F (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe GR Digital III was manufactured 5 years before the WB50F which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a in depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the GR Digital III grades against the WB50F for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR Digital III & Samsung WB50F. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery & Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Samsung WB50F
GR Digital III | WB50F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Ricoh GR Digital III
WB50F | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | July 2009 | Newer by 54 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung WB50F
GR Digital III | WB50F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera often, you need to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh GR Digital III has physical measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Samsung WB50F has specifications of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB50F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at the time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the GR Digital III versus the WB50F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital III and WB50F is 92 and 92 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions just by going through specifications. The picture below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the GR Digital III and WB50F.
Plainly, both the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The GR Digital III featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Samsung WB50F will provide extra detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung WB50F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung WB50F |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-07-27 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/1.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1 seconds | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 208g (0.46 lbs) | 207g (0.46 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $399 | $180 |