Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB50F

Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34
Ricoh GR Digital III front
 
Samsung WB50F front
Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
36
Overall
38

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Launched July 2009
  • Replacement is Ricoh GR Digital IV
Samsung WB50F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
  • Introduced January 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB50F Overview

Below, we are comparing the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB50F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and WB50F (16MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and WB50F (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The GR Digital III was manufactured 5 years before the WB50F which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting through a in depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the GR Digital III grades against the WB50F for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Samsung WB50F

 GR Digital III WB50F 
Display resolution920k460kSharper display (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Ricoh GR Digital III

 WB50F GR Digital III 
IntroducedJanuary 2014July 2009Newer by 54 months

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung WB50F

 GR Digital III WB50F 
Manual focus Dial accurate focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display sizing
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch display Neither has Touch display

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison

For those who are going to travel with your camera often, you need to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh GR Digital III has physical measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Samsung WB50F has specifications of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).

Examine the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB50F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at the time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the GR Digital III versus the WB50F.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB50F size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital III and WB50F is 92 and 92 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB50F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it's difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions just by going through specifications. The picture below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the GR Digital III and WB50F.

Plainly, both the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The GR Digital III featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Samsung WB50F will provide extra detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB50F sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB50F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB50F as a Portrait photography camera
40
focusing manually
exports RAW files
low resolution sensor (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
37
has manual focus
decent megapixels (16MP)
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh GR Digital III
Street photography with Samsung WB50F
55
exports RAW files
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (207g)
screen is fixed
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Ricoh GR Digital III
Sports photography with Samsung WB50F
17
fixed focal length (28mm)
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
40
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Ricoh GR Digital III
Travel photography with Samsung WB50F
63
built-in flash
good max aperture (f1.9)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
69
lighter than competition in class (207 grams)
decent megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (24mm)
very long reach (288mm)
does not have Timelapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB50F as a Landscape photography camera
45
focusing manually
good max aperture (f1.9)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
exports RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
47
has manual focus
reasonably wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
lack of manual mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
does not have Timelapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Vlogging highlights
Samsung WB50F Vlogging highlights
25
good max aperture (f1.9)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
no mic jack
30
reasonably wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (207 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external microphone socket
Photography Glossary

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB50F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung WB50F
 Ricoh GR Digital IIISamsung WB50F
General Information
Brand Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GR Digital III Samsung WB50F
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2009-07-27 2014-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip GR engine III -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 64 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28mm (1x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Highest aperture f/1.9 f/3.1-6.3
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 1 seconds -
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.00 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 208g (0.46 lbs) 207g (0.46 lbs)
Dimensions 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - BP70A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $399 $180