Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB750

Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34
Ricoh GR Digital III front
 
Samsung WB750 front
Portability
93
Imaging
36
Features
50
Overall
41

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Launched July 2009
  • Later Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
Samsung WB750
(Full Review)
  • 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
  • Released September 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB750 Overview

Here is a thorough review of the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Samsung WB750, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and WB750 (13MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and WB750 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The GR Digital III was unveiled 3 years before the WB750 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a quick summation of how the GR Digital III scores vs the WB750 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Samsung WB750

 GR Digital III WB750 
Display resolution920k460kSharper display (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Ricoh GR Digital III

 WB750 GR Digital III 
ReleasedSeptember 2011July 2009Fresher by 25 months

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung WB750

 GR Digital III WB750 
Focus manually More accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display measurement
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither features Touch friendly display

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR Digital III enjoys exterior measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Samsung WB750 has measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).

Analyze the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Samsung WB750 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the GR Digital III against the WB750.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB750 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital III and WB750 is 92 and 93 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB750 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison

Generally, its hard to see the gap between sensor sizing simply by reading through specs. The visual underneath may give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital III and WB750.

All in all, both of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GR Digital III having a larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Samsung WB750 will resolve greater detail having an extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older GR Digital III is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB750 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB750 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh GR Digital III
Portrait photography with Samsung WB750
40
manual focus
delivers RAW files
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
41
has manual focus
resolution is good (13MP)
has face detect focusing
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III as a Street photography camera
Samsung WB750 as a Street photography camera
55
delivers RAW files
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
61
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (193g)
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Sports photography factors
Samsung WB750 Sports photography factors
17
fixed focal length (28mm)
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect autofocus
51
excellent zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (13MP)
has tracking focus
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB750 as a Travel photography camera
63
has built in flash
great maximum aperture (f1.9)
megapixel count low (10MP)
does not have a selfie friendly display
69
lighter than average (193 grams)
resolution is good (13MP)
flash built-in
fairly wide (24mm)
great zoom (432mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.2)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB750 as a Landscape photography camera
45
manual focus
great maximum aperture (f1.9)
good sized screen (3 inches)
delivers RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
48
has manual focus
fairly wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (13 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
does not have Time Lapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Vlogging features
Samsung WB750 Vlogging features
25
great maximum aperture (f1.9)
does not have a selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
no microphone support
34
fairly wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average (193 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have mic support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB750 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung WB750
 Ricoh GR Digital IIISamsung WB750
General Information
Brand Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GR Digital III Samsung WB750
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2009-07-27 2011-09-01
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor GR engine III -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 13 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4096 x 3072
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 64 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) 24-432mm (18.0x)
Max aperture f/1.9 f/3.2-5.8
Macro focus range 1cm 5cm
Crop factor 4.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 920 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display technology - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 1 secs 8 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate - 10.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.00 m 3.30 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 208 gr (0.46 lb) 193 gr (0.43 lb)
Dimensions 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Retail pricing $399 $339