Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB800F
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Released July 2009
- Renewed by Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB800F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and WB800F (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe GR Digital III was announced 4 years prior to the WB800F which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief summation of how the GR Digital III scores vs the WB800F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung WB800F. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Samsung WB800F
GR Digital III | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Ricoh GR Digital III
WB800F | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | July 2009 | More modern by 42 months | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung WB800F
GR Digital III | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR Digital III has external measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB800F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the GR Digital III and the WB800F.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital III and WB800F is 92 and 92 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizes merely by viewing specs. The pic here should offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital III and WB800F.
All in all, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital III having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Samsung WB800F will result in more detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung WB800F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung WB800F |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2009-07-27 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1 seconds | 16 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 208 gr (0.46 lbs) | 218 gr (0.48 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $399 | $300 |