Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB800F

Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34
Ricoh GR Digital III front
 
Samsung WB800F front
Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
51
Overall
44

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Released July 2009
  • Renewed by Ricoh GR Digital IV
Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Announced January 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB800F Overview

Here, we will be looking at the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB800F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and WB800F (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizes.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The GR Digital III was announced 4 years prior to the WB800F which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief summation of how the GR Digital III scores vs the WB800F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Samsung WB800F

 GR Digital III WB800F 
Screen resolution920k460kSharper screen (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Ricoh GR Digital III

 WB800F GR Digital III 
AnnouncedJanuary 2013July 2009More modern by 42 months
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung WB800F

 GR Digital III WB800F 
Manual focus More exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen dimensions
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison

If you are going to carry around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR Digital III has external measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).

Contrast the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB800F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the GR Digital III and the WB800F.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB800F size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital III and WB800F is 92 and 92 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB800F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizes merely by viewing specs. The pic here should offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital III and WB800F.

All in all, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital III having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Samsung WB800F will result in more detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB800F sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB800F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Portrait photography features
Samsung WB800F Portrait photography features
40
manual focus
supports RAW files
low resolution (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
44
you can focus manually
good megapixels (16MP)
features face detect focus
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Street photography details
Samsung WB800F Street photography details
55
supports RAW files
no moving screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (218 grams)
no moving screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Ricoh GR Digital III
Sports photography with Samsung WB800F
17
can't change focal length (28mm)
no image stabilization
low resolution (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect autofocus
53
incredible zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
features tracking focus
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Travel photography details
Samsung WB800F Travel photography details
63
has built in flash
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
low resolution (10MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
69
lighter than competition (218g)
good megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
fairly wide (23mm)
great zoom (483mm)
no Timelapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Landscape photography information
Samsung WB800F Landscape photography information
45
manual focus
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
screen is a good size (3")
supports RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
no image stabilization
low resolution (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
50
you can focus manually
fairly wide (23mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
no Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Vlogging features
Samsung WB800F Vlogging features
25
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
missing external mic jack
35
fairly wide (23mm)
touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition (218 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
no microphone port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB800F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung WB800F
 Ricoh GR Digital IIISamsung WB800F
General Information
Company Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GR Digital III Samsung WB800F
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2009-07-27 2013-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor GR engine III -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 -
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 64 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Maximum aperture f/1.9 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focus range 1cm -
Crop factor 4.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 920 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1 seconds 16 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.00 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 208 gr (0.46 lbs) 218 gr (0.48 lbs)
Physical dimensions 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Price at launch $399 $300