Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB850F
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
91 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB850F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Launched July 2009
- Updated by Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
- Announced January 2012
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB850F Overview
In this article, we are looking at the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Samsung WB850F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and WB850F (16MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and WB850F (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe GR Digital III was launched 3 years prior to the WB850F which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a quick view of how the GR Digital III grades versus the WB850F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB850F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR Digital III & Samsung WB850F. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery & Samsung WB850F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Samsung WB850F
GR Digital III | WB850F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 614k | Clearer display (+306k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB850F over the Ricoh GR Digital III
WB850F | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2012 | July 2009 | More modern by 29 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung WB850F
GR Digital III | WB850F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB850F Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR Digital III features outside measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) and the Samsung WB850F has proportions of 109mm x 62mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") having a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Samsung WB850F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the GR Digital III against the WB850F.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital III and WB850F is 92 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB850F Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to see the difference in sensor sizes only by viewing specs. The picture below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital III and WB850F.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital III due to its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Samsung WB850F will render extra detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB850F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB850F Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung WB850F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung WB850F |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-07-27 | 2012-01-09 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | - | AMOLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 3.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 208g (0.46 pounds) | 250g (0.55 pounds) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $399 | $599 |