Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB850F

Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34
Ricoh GR Digital III front
 
Samsung WB850F front
Portability
91
Imaging
39
Features
51
Overall
43

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB850F Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Launched July 2009
  • Updated by Ricoh GR Digital IV
Samsung WB850F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
  • Announced January 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB850F Overview

In this article, we are looking at the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Samsung WB850F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and WB850F (16MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and WB850F (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor dimensions.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The GR Digital III was launched 3 years prior to the WB850F which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a quick view of how the GR Digital III grades versus the WB850F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Samsung WB850F

 GR Digital III WB850F 
Display resolution920k614kClearer display (+306k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB850F over the Ricoh GR Digital III

 WB850F GR Digital III 
AnnouncedJanuary 2012July 2009More modern by 29 months

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung WB850F

 GR Digital III WB850F 
Manually focus Very accurate focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display sizing
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither includes Touch friendly display

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB850F Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR Digital III features outside measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) and the Samsung WB850F has proportions of 109mm x 62mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") having a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).

Contrast the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Samsung WB850F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the GR Digital III against the WB850F.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB850F size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital III and WB850F is 92 and 91 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB850F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB850F Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very difficult to see the difference in sensor sizes only by viewing specs. The picture below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital III and WB850F.

As you can plainly see, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital III due to its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Samsung WB850F will render extra detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB850F sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB850F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB850F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Portrait photography info
Samsung WB850F Portrait photography info
40
has manual focus
supports RAW files
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
43
has manual focus
resolution is good (16MP)
includes face detect focus
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Street photography highlights
Samsung WB850F Street photography highlights
55
supports RAW files
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
61
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (250 grams)
fixed screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Sports photography advice
Samsung WB850F Sports photography advice
17
can't change focal length (28mm)
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
52
long zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
includes tracking focus
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Travel photography information
Samsung WB850F Travel photography information
63
built-in flash
fast max aperture (f1.9)
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
69
lighter than average (250 grams)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
relatively wide (23mm)
great reach (483mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Landscape photography details
Samsung WB850F Landscape photography details
45
has manual focus
fast max aperture (f1.9)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
supports RAW files
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
49
has manual focus
relatively wide (23mm)
screen is a good size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
lack of Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III as a Vlogging camera
Samsung WB850F as a Vlogging camera
25
fast max aperture (f1.9)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have external microphone socket
34
relatively wide (23mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect focus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average (250g)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
lack of mic socket
Photography Glossary

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB850F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung WB850F
 Ricoh GR Digital IIISamsung WB850F
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GR Digital III Samsung WB850F
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2009-07-27 2012-01-09
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip GR engine III -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 64 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28mm (1x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Maximum aperture f/1.9 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing distance 1cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 920 thousand dots 614 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display technology - AMOLED display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1 secs 8 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate - 10.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 3.50 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 208g (0.46 pounds) 250g (0.55 pounds)
Dimensions 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $399 $599