Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma DP1 Merrill
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
82 Imaging
56 Features
30 Overall
45
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Newer Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 64mm
- Released February 2012
- Updated by Sigma DP2 Merrill
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sigma DP1 Merrill, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Sigma. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and DP1 Merrill (15MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and DP1 Merrill (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe GR Digital III was introduced 3 years prior to the DP1 Merrill and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP1 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the GR Digital III grades versus the DP1 Merrill with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR Digital III & Sigma DP1 Merrill. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery & Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Sigma DP1 Merrill
GR Digital III | DP1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | " | Bigger screen (+3") |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP1 Merrill over the Ricoh GR Digital III
DP1 Merrill | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | July 2009 | Fresher by 30 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sigma DP1 Merrill
GR Digital III | DP1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 920k | Exact same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR Digital III provides exterior measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) and the Sigma DP1 Merrill has sizing of 122mm x 67mm x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") having a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sigma DP1 Merrill in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the GR Digital III vs the DP1 Merrill.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital III and DP1 Merrill is 92 and 82 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizing merely by reading through specifications. The visual here may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital III and DP1 Merrill.
To sum up, the two cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The GR Digital III having a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF tougher and the Sigma DP1 Merrill will give you extra detail using its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older GR Digital III is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Sigma DP1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital III | Sigma DP1 Merrill |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-07-27 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | GR engine III | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 15MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4704 x 3136 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | () |
Largest aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | - |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1 seconds | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 208 gr (0.46 pounds) | 330 gr (0.73 pounds) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 122 x 67 x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $399 | $1,250 |