Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma DP2 Merrill
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Launched July 2009
- Successor is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Introduced February 2012
- Earlier Model is Sigma DP1 Merrill
- New Model is Sigma DP3 Merrill
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sigma DP2 Merrill, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Sigma. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and DP2 Merrill (15MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) posses different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GR Digital III was launched 3 years before the DP2 Merrill and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the GR Digital III scores against the DP2 Merrill when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR Digital III & Sigma DP2 Merrill. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery & Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Sigma DP2 Merrill
GR Digital III | DP2 Merrill |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Ricoh GR Digital III
DP2 Merrill | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2012 | July 2009 | More recent by 30 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sigma DP2 Merrill
GR Digital III | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 920k | Exact same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR Digital III comes with outer dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Merrill has dimensions of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") along with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sigma DP2 Merrill in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at the time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the GR Digital III against the DP2 Merrill.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital III and DP2 Merrill is 92 and 83 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to visualize the gap in sensor measurements just by seeing specs. The visual here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the GR Digital III and DP2 Merrill.
All in all, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The GR Digital III due to its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Sigma DP2 Merrill will provide greater detail utilizing its extra 5MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older GR Digital III will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Sigma DP2 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital III | Sigma DP2 Merrill |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-07-27 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | GR engine III | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4704 x 3136 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 50mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1 secs | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640x480 |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 208 grams (0.46 lb) | 330 grams (0.73 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $399 | $931 |